Libby Subpoenas the Media

Libby Subpoenas the Media


Filed 1/20/06 Excerpts
Discovery Status Report


Media subpoenaed 3/14/06 (see 4/18/06 and 5/17/06 for actual subpoenas).

Filed 4/18/06
Subpoena to Judith Miller issued 3/14/06



Filed 4/3/06
ORDER
Regarding media seeking to quash or modify subpoenas.



Media Motions to Quash

Filed 4/18/06
MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY SUBPOENA TO TIME INC.

Filed 4/18/06
MOTION OF JUDITH MILLER TO QUASH SUBPOENA

In a related development, The Post yesterday was subpoenaed by Libby's defense team to produce records related to the case that the newspaper had not turned over to Fitzgerald. Eric Lieberman, a counsel at The Post, said the newspaper would comply by providing Libby with a complete copy of a memorandum by Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward from his interview with Libby on June 27, 2003.
WaPo 4/14/06



Libby Response to Media Motions to Quash

Filed 5/1/06 Part1
Filed 5/1/06 Part2
Filed 5/1/06 29 Exhibits
I. LEWIS LIBBY CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO QUASH BY NBC NEWS, JUDITH MILLER, ANDREA MITCHELL, MATTHEW COOPER, TIME INC, AND THE NEW YORK TIMES AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT


Media Response to Libby subpoenas

Filed 5/8/06 All Media Response in HTML

Filed 5/8/06
REPLY OF JUDITH MILLER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH

Filed 5/8/06
THE NEW YORK TIMES' REPLY TO DEFENDANT I. LEWIS LIBBY'S
RESPONSE TO MOTION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES
TO QUASH LIBBY'S RULE 17(c) SUBPOENA

Filed 5/8/06
REPLY BRIEF OF TIME INC. IN SUPPORT OF ITS
MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY

Filed 5/8/06
REPLY OF MATTHEW COOPER IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO QUASH

Filed 5/8/06
REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF
NON-PARTIES NBC NEWS AND ANDREA MITCHELL TO QUASH SUBPOENAS





Libby Response

Filed 5/17/06
Libby MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

Included Media subpoenas of almost every reporter in Washington





Opinion

Filed 5/26/06
Filed 5/26/06 HTLM cboldt
Memorandum Opinion

Upon consideration of the papers filed in connection with these motions to quash and the oral arguments heard by the Court on these motions, for the reasons set forth below, Judith Miller’s motion is granted, but all other motions are granted in part and denied in part.

Analysis Marcy Wheeler


Filed 5/26/06
ORDER